April 10, 2026 ChainGPT

Trump-linked WLFI routed millions through Dolomite - advisor ties raise DeFi liquidity risks

Trump-linked WLFI routed millions through Dolomite - advisor ties raise DeFi liquidity risks
Headline: Trump-linked crypto firm routes millions through DeFi protocol co-founded by its advisor — onchain trail raises red flags Onchain records analyzed by CoinDesk — drawn from Etherscan, Arkham and publicly accessible wallets — show World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the crypto venture co-founded by the Trump family, executed a flurry of DeFi transactions through lending protocol Dolomite that highlight possible insider access, circular token mechanics and concentrated counterparty risk for ordinary depositors. Key timeline - Feb. 8: WLFI’s treasury deposited 14 million USD1 (its dollar-pegged stablecoin) into Dolomite as collateral and borrowed 11.4 million USDC. Minutes later, roughly 11.45 million USDC moved to a Coinbase Prime deposit address. - Feb. 10: The treasury sent 12.5 million USD1 directly from its wallet to a separate Coinbase Prime deposit address — a direct fiat off-ramp that was not borrowed from Dolomite. - Feb. 20: The treasury deposited 890 million WLFI tokens into Dolomite and borrowed 20 million USD1 against them. - March 24: An additional 1.1 billion WLFI tokens were supplied as collateral. In total, 1.99 billion WLFI now sit as collateral on Dolomite and the treasury has drawn roughly $31.4 million in stablecoins from the protocol across these episodes. - April 2–7: The treasury moved 3 billion WLFI to a Gnosis Safe proxy wallet (2 billion then 1 billion). Those transfers did not go straight to Dolomite, and their ultimate destination is not visible onchain. At WLFI’s current price of $0.0888, the three billion tokens are worth about $266 million. Why the choice of protocol matters Dolomite’s co-founder, Corey Caplan, is an advisor to World Liberty Financial — a relationship that amplifies scrutiny over the transactions. WLFI now ranks at the top of Dolomite’s supplied-assets list with $458.9 million in supply liquidity, roughly 55% of the protocol’s reported $835.7 million total supply. Concentrated borrowing and liquidation risk The structural concern centers on Dolomite’s USD1 pool. With USD1 now showing about $4.6 billion in circulation, the pool has roughly $180 million supplied against $167.5 million borrowed — a utilization ratio near 93%. Supply and borrow APRs in that pool sit at approximately 16.24% and 9.18%, respectively, suggesting heavy, concentrated borrowing activity rather than broad organic lending demand. At such high utilization, normal depositors who supplied USD1 cannot all withdraw at once without being blocked or forced to accept losses; their funds are effectively locked until large borrowers unwind positions. Compounding this is the collateral profile: WLFI has limited market depth relative to the size of the loans it’s backing. A sharp drop in WLFI’s price that triggers Dolomite’s liquidation mechanics could cause forced selling that crashes the token, potentially leaving the protocol with unrecoverable bad debt — a burden that would fall on retail depositors in the pool. Onchain flows suggest active fiat off-ramps The nearly simultaneous movement of borrowed USDC to Coinbase Prime and the direct transfer of USD1 to Coinbase Prime point to use of the exchange as an institutional fiat off-ramp. That mix of borrowed and non-borrowed stablecoin flows, combined with large amounts of WLFI used as collateral on a protocol advised by WLFI’s own advisor, raises questions around related-party risk and market resilience. WLFI did not immediately respond to CoinDesk’s request for comment. What to watch - Whether the 3 billion WLFI routed to the Gnosis Safe proxy appear on other venues or are redeployed onchain. - Any debt repayments or unwinds in the USD1 pool that would reduce utilization. - Public commentary from Dolomite or WLFI addressing advisor relationships, collateral policies and liquidation protections. This set of onchain transfers underscores how concentrated positions, advisor ties and thin token markets can create systemic fragility in DeFi pools — and why transparency around counterparties and collateral quality matters for everyday depositors. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news