Headline: “Can the Government ‘Bail Out’ Bitcoin?” — Bizarre Capitol Hill Exchange Puts Crypto Questions to Treasury Secretary
At a sometimes awkward House Financial Services hearing Wednesday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was pressed on a question that felt more suited to a political thought experiment than standard oversight: “Does the Treasury Department… have the authority to bail out Bitcoin?” Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) asked.
Bessent paused and asked Sherman to clarify what he meant by “bail out Bitcoin,” underscoring a core confusion: the difference between the Bitcoin token and the decentralized network that underpins it. The secretary pointed out that the Bitcoin network itself wouldn’t collapse if the token’s price fell — it operated for years when a single bitcoin was worth only cents. He also said he has no authority to order U.S. banks to buy Bitcoin, responding directly to another of Sherman’s follow-ups.
Sherman then asked whether taxpayer dollars could ever be used to invest in crypto assets. Bessent did not commit to an answer but defended existing policy in which the government retains seized cryptocurrency rather than immediately liquidating it — a practice driven by law enforcement and asset-forfeiture processes, he implied.
The hearing quickly moved from conceptual questions about bailouts to a more pointed, contentious exchange when Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) raised the issue of World Liberty Financial, a crypto company tied to the Trump family. Meeks asked whether Bessent would direct the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to block a bank charter for the firm pending investigation into a reported partial acquisition by a UAE-linked entity tied to a high-profile AI chip deal. Bessent declined to comment on the specifics, noting that the OCC operates independently.
The interaction escalated: Bessent accused Meeks of past conduct related to a 2006 trip to Venezuela; voices rose until committee chair Rep. French Hill (R-AR) intervened. “Stop covering for the president!” Meeks yelled. “Don’t be a flunky, work for the American people!”
Bottom line: the hearing highlighted continuing confusion among lawmakers about how (and whether) traditional government tools — bank charters, taxpayer funds, seizure policies — intersect with decentralized assets. Treasury refused to endorse any hypothetical “bailout,” asserted limits on its authority over banks, and reiterated the independence of banking regulators when pressed on politically sensitive corporate dealings.
Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
