Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.42T
Market Cap
$2.42T
24h Trading Volume
$93.91B
BTC Dominance
56.64%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Dogecoin Drops Below $0.092 as Bears Grip Market; $0.0925 Resistance Holds
Headline: Dogecoin Loses Footing Below $0.092 — Bears Take Control as Key Resistances Hold Quick take Dogecoin (DOGE) has slipped below the $0.0920 mark and is consolidating losses on the hourly chart, with immediate upside capped by a bearish trend line and several fib retracements. Data from Kraken show the token trading under the 100-hour simple moving average, while momentum indicators signal further downside risk unless bulls reclaim key levels. Price action and technical picture - Breakdown: DOGE fell through $0.0920, $0.0912 and $0.0905, printing a low near $0.0899 before a weak recovery. - Moving average: Price is trading below the 100‑hour SMA, reinforcing short-term weakness. - Trend line & fibs: A bearish trend line offers resistance around $0.0918 on the hourly chart — the same area as the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the $0.0935→$0.0899 decline. DOGE also failed to reclaim the 23.6% retracement during the bounce. - Momentum: Hourly MACD is gaining in the bearish zone and the RSI sits below 50, both pointing to downside momentum. Key levels to watch - Immediate resistance: $0.0912, then $0.0918 (trend line / 50% Fib), and $0.0925. A clear close above $0.0925 could open the path to $0.0950, $0.0980 and the $0.10 psychological level. - Immediate support: $0.0900, then $0.0880. The main support sits near $0.0850 — a break there could target $0.0800 and even $0.0750 in the near term. What it means As long as DOGE remains below the $0.0918–$0.0925 zone, sellers look to have the edge and the market could extend losses toward the $0.088–$0.085 area. A decisive recovery above those resistances would be needed to shift momentum back to the bulls and aim for the $0.095–$0.10 range. Data source: Kraken (hourly DOGE/USD). Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Former Ripple CTO JoelKatz: XRP Value Should Reflect Payment Utility as XRPL Gains Momentum
Headline: David “JoelKatz” Schwartz Pushes Back on “Cheap XRP” Narrative — Says Value Should Reflect Payment Utility as XRPL Ecosystem Heats Up Ripple’s former CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz is reframing a long-debated line about XRP — and the clarification changes how the token’s future is being discussed. Instead of endorsing speculation, Schwartz says his 2017 remark that XRP “can’t be dirt cheap” was about payments design and utility, not investor returns. Schwartz: “Not about holders — about payments” In a recent X thread highlighted by user Diana, Schwartz revisited the oft-quoted phrase and objected to how the community has interpreted it. He stressed the point was made from a payments-engineering perspective: when XRP is used as a bridge asset to move value across borders, the dollar value of a transaction is fixed, but the number of tokens required depends on XRP’s price. If XRP trades very low, you need many more tokens to settle the same fiat amount — increasing slippage, market friction and inefficiency for large flows. Conversely, a higher XRP price reduces the token quantity needed per transaction, improving liquidity and operational efficiency for high-volume cross-border payments. In short: higher utility — not a speculative “pump” for holders — is what makes a higher price functionally desirable for payment rails. Ecosystem momentum: SBI, RealFi, and tokenization talk Market observers point to growing momentum around real-world use cases on the XRP Ledger that could validate Schwartz’s utility-first view: - SBI Holdings: Influencer “Ledger Man” reported that Yoshitaka Kitao, SBI’s CEO, has publicly expressed strong confidence in XRP’s long-term prospects and suggested adoption could push the asset’s price higher. SBI is reportedly deepening collaboration with Ripple and exploring RLUSD integration and blockchain-based bond solutions. - RealFi and REAL Token: The RealFi initiative, built on the XRPL and powered by the REAL Token, is set to announce a major global partnership (expected on April 17). The project aims to introduce payment rewards across industries and scale XRPL payments and tokenization for real-world assets. - Tokenization at scale: Social posts citing BlackRock CEO Larry Fink argue the industry may be underestimating how quickly traditional financial assets will become tokenized — a trend that aligns with efforts to expand XRPL’s role in payments and asset tokenization. Why it matters Schwartz’s clarification reframes XRP’s price discussion away from pure speculation and toward network design and real-world utility. If large financial flows and tokenized assets increasingly rely on XRPL as a bridge, liquidity dynamics could naturally push pricing in ways that favor efficient settlement. That’s the core of the argument: XRP’s value should reflect its effectiveness as a high-efficiency bridge asset in global payments — and the XRPL ecosystem’s recent partnerships and projects are trying to make that case. What to watch - April 17: the expected XRPL partnership announcement involving RealFi/REAL Token. - Further developments from SBI and Ripple on RLUSD and tokenized bond projects. - Comments and moves by major financial players discussing large-scale tokenization, which could influence demand for bridge assets like XRP. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Likely Bitmine Pulls $82M in ETH From FalconX as Ethereum Fights to Hold $2,150
Headline: Big institutional withdrawal — likely Bitmine — moves $82M in ETH as Ethereum fights to hold $2,150 Ethereum is trying to hold above $2,150 as the market shows tentative signs of waking up — and on-chain sleuths just spotted a transaction that could matter to price action. What happened - Arkham Intelligence flagged a fresh wallet that withdrew roughly $82 million worth of ETH from FalconX within the past hour. - FalconX is an institutional prime brokerage (not a retail exchange) that services hedge funds, corporate treasuries and other sophisticated market players. That narrows the set of possible actors and raises the withdrawal’s significance. Why it matters - A withdrawal from FalconX isn’t a sell on an exchange; it’s ETH leaving an institutional custody-and-settlement venue and moving into a wallet the owner controls. That behavior reads like accumulation — an actor taking custody rather than exiting the position. At around $2,150, someone just committed roughly $82 million to a buy-and-hold stance. - Arkham’s forensics go further than the transfer itself: the transaction signature and the wallet’s acquisition pattern (the routing through FalconX, sizing, timing and structure) closely match the known behavior of Bitmine — the digital-asset treasury vehicle associated with Tom Lee. That match isn’t a smoking-gun attribution, but it’s the strongest signal short of confirmation given how fresh and unattributed the wallet is. Context on Bitmine and staking - Bitmine has been one of the most aggressive institutional ETH accumulators visible on-chain, channeling purchases through institutional rails, moving holdings into custody, and locking large amounts into staking contracts rather than keeping it liquid. Its staked ETH position has climbed into the billions, representing sustained removal of supply from liquid markets. - If this newest withdrawal follows that pattern, it effectively takes another $82 million of ETH out of circulating liquidity — not temporarily, but as a committed allocation to custody or staking. Technical backdrop - Ethereum is attempting to stabilize above $2,150, but the daily structure still looks like a market in recovery, not a confirmed uptrend. The decisive February breakdown erased the $2,600–$2,800 range on heavy volume and pushed price below $2,000, resetting positioning. - Since then ETH has been rangebound roughly between $1,900 and $2,300, with repeated failed attempts to push higher. Price remains below the 50-, 100- and 200-day moving averages, all sloping down and acting as layered resistance. - The recovery’s character is telling: the bounce was sharp but follow-through has been limited, and trading volume is lower than during the sell-off — a sign buyers aren’t yet matching prior seller conviction. Key levels to watch - Reclaiming $2,300 cleanly would open a path back toward $2,600. - Conversely, failing to hold $2,100 risks another test of the $1,900 range, where structural support matters most. Bottom line An $82 million institutional withdrawal from FalconX — potentially tied to Bitmine — underscores continued institutional accumulation and staking demand that can shrink liquid ETH supply. That dynamic is meaningful, but technicals and thin volume keep any bullish case tentative until buyers show sustained conviction above major resistance. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
James Wynn Liquidated Again — Sixth High‑Leverage Wipeout in Two Weeks as BTC Surges
Notorious high‑leverage trader James Wynn has been liquidated again as Bitcoin surged, marking his sixth wipeout in roughly two weeks. On‑chain data from Wynn’s Hyperliquid wallet, highlighted by Lookonchain on X, shows a forced closure near $68,000 for his latest position. That latest liquidation adds to an already brutal track record: research into his Hyperliquid account counts at least 194 historical liquidations prior to this recent streak. Wynn built a public profile in 2025 by running outsized perpetual‑swap bets on Bitcoin and memecoins. At one point he reportedly sat on more than $80 million in paper profits after a run of successful, highly leveraged trades and was an early backer of $PEPE. But his approach has also produced headline‑grabbing failures—most notably an infamous 40x Bitcoin long that ballooned into an enormous notional position and carried a liquidation level just a few thousand dollars below spot. Rather than stepping back, Wynn doubled down repeatedly. In late spring 2025 he logged a string of liquidations—nine on a single wallet at one point—with cumulative losses approaching $22 million. By year‑end his pattern of repeated wipeouts had become a widely cited cautionary tale about the perils of hyper‑leverage. Since mid‑March 2026, Wynn has again been leaning into high‑leverage BTC shorts, typically around 40x with notional sizes between roughly $44k and $190k. Smaller intraday rallies have repeatedly hit his liquidation levels: he suffered a full wipeout on March 25, and by month’s end three separate 40x shorts were blown out after modest price moves. At 40x leverage, moves of roughly 2.5% against a position are enough to trigger a complete margin collapse, turning routine post‑ETF rallies or short squeezes into fatal events for high‑risk bets. Wynn’s repeated liquidations underscore a broader truth in today’s market: hyper‑volatile Bitcoin price action combined with concentrated, high‑leverage positioning is unforgiving. Traders say his activity now functions almost like a sentiment indicator—every time he loads into crowded shorts while BTC is grinding higher, his entries can become the fuel for squeezes rather than effective contrarian plays. His case remains an object lesson: large account size doesn’t immunize a trader from the math of leverage. In a trending market, casino‑level leverage and tiny margins for error can turn a confident trade into another public wipeout. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
MicroStrategy's Bitcoin Bet Fuels Market Churn as Meme Stocks, China ADRs Roil Quiet Rally
U.S. markets ticked higher Monday, but the calm index closes masked a choppy session driven by meme stocks, bitcoin‑sensitive names and China ADRs — a classic late‑cycle dispersion that matters for crypto investors. Benchmarks: the Dow rose 0.36%, the S&P 500 gained 0.45% and the Nasdaq added 0.5% (Gate market data). Yet individual stocks swung wildly: AMC jumped 12%, MicroStrategy climbed 6%, Advanced Micro Devices fell 5% and Tesla slipped 2%. Crypto angle: MicroStrategy’s rally underlined the growing role of Bitcoin‑exposed equities. The software firm’s aggressive BTC accumulation continues to make its shares behave like a leveraged proxy for Bitcoin, amplifying moves in the crypto market and drawing investor attention. More broadly, names tied to crypto and meme trading outperformed, driven by retail flows and short‑covering. Meme volatility: AMC extended a recent rebound with a 12% surge, a move traced to renewed retail interest and short squeezes. Those kinds of flows are increasingly decoupled from headline index performance and can produce outsized stock moves. Pressure on growth and EVs: By contrast, high‑multiple growth and electric‑vehicle names took hits — AMD fell 5% and Tesla slipped 2% — as investors rotated within the tech and consumer discretionary complex, selectively reallocating risk. China slump: U.S.‑listed Chinese stocks remained under pressure. The Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index closed down 0.2%, while iQIYI plunged about 4%. Recent sharper drops in the index, including days when Alibaba, NIO and XPeng slid 3%–6%, reflect lingering concerns about China’s growth outlook, regulatory risk and U.S.‑China tensions. Bigger picture: The modest index gains come after a strong 2025 — the S&P rose more than 16% and the Nasdaq gained over 20% (Reuters, LSEG) — meaning even small daily moves can hide significant stock‑level volatility. For crypto and retail traders, that setup favors active stock‑picking and thematic bets (meme, Bitcoin proxies, China names) over passive beta exposure. Takeaway for crypto readers: watch Bitcoin flows and MicroStrategy — its balance sheet moves can reverberate through crypto‑linked equities — and expect continued episodic volatility as retail trading, macro themes and geopolitical risks keep individual stocks swinging far more than the headline indexes. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Federal AI Rush Echoes Cloud-Era Lock-In — Warning for Crypto & Web3
A new ProPublica investigation warns that the federal government is repeating the same rush-to-adopt mistakes with artificial intelligence that it made a decade ago with cloud computing — and those errors could leave agencies exposed once again. What happened before Renee Dudley’s April 6 piece argues the Biden and Trump administrations’ push to get agencies using AI from big tech looks eerily familiar to the Obama-era scramble to move government systems to the cloud. The White House has framed AI adoption as a national competitiveness priority, and agencies are being offered cheap, easy access to powerful models — OpenAI’s ChatGPT for $1 per user, Google’s Gemini for $0.47, and xAI’s Grok for $0.42. The speed and low cost echo how cloud deals were sold in the early 2010s: transformational, urgent, and cost-saving on paper. Three cautionary lessons - Free offerings can be lock-in. Microsoft’s 2021 promise to give the federal government $150 million in security services looks, in practice, like a strategic way to entrench its products inside agencies. Once agencies accepted the free upgrades, switching vendors would be costly and disruptive. “It was successful beyond what any of us could have imagined,” a former Microsoft salesperson told ProPublica. Even Microsoft and OpenAI have since disagreed publicly over contract terms, illustrating how fraught AI partnerships can be — even for the companies involved. - Oversight needs funding and staff. FedRAMP, the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program created in 2011 to vet cloud services, was worn down for years to approve a major cloud product despite cybersecurity concerns. ProPublica reports FedRAMP now operates “with an absolute minimum of support staff” and “limited customer service.” The GSA defends the program, saying it “operates with strengthened oversight and accountability mechanisms,” but former employees described it as increasingly unable to scrutinize products rigorously. - Independent reviews have conflicts. As FedRAMP’s in-house capacity shrank, third-party auditors picked up much of the vetting work — and those firms are paid by the companies they audit. Understaffed agencies often rely on those third-party certifications rather than conducting their own deep reviews, creating a structural conflict of interest and less reliable oversight. Why this matters for AI and crypto observers The risks aren’t just bureaucratic. Dudley warns the downsizing of oversight capacity has “far-reaching” implications for federal cybersecurity as agencies start using AI tools that can process highly sensitive data under the same weakened framework that struggled with cloud security. The GSA has cautioned that AI “usage costs can grow quickly without proper monitoring and management controls,” and it recommends setting usage caps and reviewing consumption — but those steps don’t solve the deeper problems of underfunded regulators, vendor-dependent audits, and limited leverage once technology is embedded. For crypto and web3 communities watching governance of digital infrastructure, the parallels are clear: when governments adopt powerful tech quickly and cheaply, they can become dependent on a few large vendors while lacking the staff and independent review needed to manage risk. The result is a governance gap at a moment when AI systems are increasingly central to how public services and sensitive data are handled. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news