Sam Bankman‑Fried has lost a major legal fight to overturn his 2023 fraud conviction and 25‑year prison sentence, after a federal appeals panel on Friday unanimously rejected his challenge and left the verdict intact.
What the court decided
A three‑judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in an opinion written by Circuit Judge Barrington Parker, concluded the evidence presented by prosecutors was “robust” and supported the jury’s findings. The ruling upheld convictions tied to the collapse of the FTX exchange, where prosecutors say customer funds were diverted to Alameda Research — the trading firm SBF founded — and used for personal expenses, political donations, investments and real estate.
Background and the case against SBF
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan described the scheme at trial as a “fraud of epic proportions.” A federal jury in 2023 convicted Bankman‑Fried on seven counts, including fraud and conspiracy, after prosecutors said roughly $8 billion in customer funds was misappropriated. At trial, SBF acknowledged management mistakes but denied stealing customer assets and pleaded not guilty.
Defense arguments and the appeals court response
SBF’s lawyers argued Judge Lewis Kaplan improperly limited evidence that could have shown FTX was still capable of meeting customer withdrawals — a point they said would support a lack of fraudulent intent. The appeals court disagreed, citing precedent that fraud occurs when money or property is obtained through deception, regardless of any later intent to repay. The panel noted customers were defrauded once their funds were transferred to Alameda, even if there was later belief the money could be returned.
Earlier post‑trial moves
Bankman‑Fried previously pursued a retrial under Rule 33, claiming new evidence and testimony, but withdrew that motion before it was formally rejected in April. Judge Kaplan found the witnesses cited were not newly discovered and could have been produced at the original trial. Prosecutors also disputed defense claims that FTX was solvent pre‑collapse, saying the exchange held only 105 Bitcoin against customer claims approaching 100,000 Bitcoin.
Clemency and next steps
Although this appeal is resolved against him, SBF continues to pursue clemency: records show he has filed an application with the Department of Justice’s Office of the Pardon Attorney seeking a “pardon after completion of sentence.” President Trump told The New York Times earlier he had no plans to pardon Bankman‑Fried, a stance reiterated by a White House spokesperson when questioned about the filing. Public calls for clemency have been limited; Senator Cynthia Lummis told Politico she hopes there will be no pardon given the harm to customers.
Current status and remaining legal options
The 34‑year‑old is serving his sentence at a low‑security federal prison near Santa Barbara and, Bureau of Prisons records indicate, is eligible for release in 2044. His attorneys had not responded to requests for comment about Friday’s decision. Remaining legal options include seeking an en banc review by the full Second Circuit or petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.
Why it matters for crypto
The ruling reinforces accountability for executives in the crypto industry and underscores the legal risks of mixing customer assets with proprietary trading. For the broader market, the case remains a touchstone in debates over transparency, custody practices and regulatory oversight in crypto.
Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
