Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.43T
Market Cap
$2.43T
24h Trading Volume
$96.92B
BTC Dominance
56.62%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Binance’s compliance rebuild strains as AML, sanctions teams exit; CCO Noah Perlman may leave
Binance’s long-running compliance rebuild is showing new signs of strain as departures hit teams that monitor financial crime and sanctions — and Chief Compliance Officer Noah Perlman is reportedly weighing his own exit, Bloomberg says. Perlman, who was hired in January 2023 to lead a post‑plea overhaul of Binance’s sanctions enforcement and anti‑money‑laundering (AML) systems, is “discussing future departure matters” with management and could leave as soon as this year or next, the report said. Several staffers in units responsible for financial‑crime surveillance and sanctions checks have already left, according to people familiar with the situation. The personnel turbulence comes against the backdrop of Binance’s $4.3 billion guilty plea in the U.S., one of the largest corporate penalties in American history. Under that deal, Binance and founder Changpeng Zhao acknowledged violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions rules; the package included $2.5 billion in forfeiture and a $1.8 billion criminal fine. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said the settlement “sends an unmistakable message” to the crypto industry. Regulators have since collected more than $32 billion in penalties from crypto firms, with Binance’s settlement among the largest individual amounts. Binance pushed back on Bloomberg’s account, saying Perlman “remains focused on his current work,” that no departure timeline has been set and no successor has been chosen. The exchange points to heavy investment in compliance since 2023 — claiming a 30% increase in compliance headcount and a 96% reduction in “direct exposure to illicit activity” between January 2023 and June 2025. Perlman has characterized those gains as proof the company’s systems now “anticipate” threats rather than merely reacting to them. But independent reporting has challenged that upbeat picture. A Financial Times investigation found evidence that suspicious accounts with links to terror financing and other red flags continued to move hundreds of millions of dollars through the platform even after the 2023 plea agreement and promised monitoring upgrades. Those findings raise fresh doubts about whether Binance’s revamped compliance apparatus is functioning at the level regulators demand. The dispute over Binance’s compliance progress plays out amid broader efforts by the exchange to reduce U.S. oversight. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Binance executives have lobbied Washington to remove an independent U.S. monitor installed after the plea deal to oversee AML controls. Meanwhile, coverage by crypto.news has charted how regulatory pressure has reshaped Binance’s global footprint and governance — from Zhao’s resignation and guilty plea to scrutiny of the U.S. affiliate’s custody practices. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has accused the exchange of allowing funds to flow to terrorists and cybercriminals while ignoring basic AML obligations. Binance’s own metrics paint a sharp improvement on paper: sanctions‑related exposure reportedly fell from 0.284% in January 2024 to 0.009% in July 2025 (a 96.8% drop), the firm says. It also cites processing over 71,000 law‑enforcement requests and facilitating about $131 million in confiscations linked to illicit activity. Whether those numbers hold up under scrutiny — and whether the compliance program can sustain progress amid continued staff churn and the potential exit of the executive who was hired to lead the clean‑up — will be key signals for regulators, institutional partners and markets evaluating Binance’s future risk profile. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
MicroStrategy Restarts Buying with $330M STRC-Funded Purchase of 4,871 BTC
Strategy reignited its Bitcoin buying this week, announcing a $330 million purchase that added 4,871 BTC to its coffers — a move the Tysons Corner, Virginia-based firm funded mostly with proceeds from its variable-rate preferred share, STRC. Quick takeaways - Purchase: 4,871 BTC for $330 million (about $67,700 per BTC). - Total holdings: nearly 767,000 BTC, valued at roughly $53.3 billion. - Funding mix last week: $227 million raised via STRC vs. $72 million from common shares. - Recent pause: the firm had skipped disclosing a buy the prior week, interrupting a 13-week buying streak during which it accumulated 90,831 BTC. STRC and capital strategy Strategy leaned heavily on its dividend-paying preferred share, STRC, to finance the latest buy. The company has been issuing STRC to keep the share’s price near its $100 par value — when STRC trades above $100, Strategy signals it will issue more. Last month the firm raised over $1.5 billion through STRC, and the preferred traded above $100 for four straight days last week. Profit-and-loss snapshot - In a financial update, Strategy said the market value of its Bitcoin holdings fell by $14.46 billion in Q1. That drop exceeded the $12.4 billion loss reported in Q4. - As of Monday the company’s Bitcoin position was about $4.9 billion underwater. - Since it began buying Bitcoin in 2020, Strategy’s average purchase price is $75,600 per BTC. Market reaction and context - Strategy shares were poised to open down about 2.4% to near $199, according to Yahoo Finance. The stock is down 21% year-to-date and roughly 65% versus six months ago from $359. - Bitcoin itself rose to approximately $69,480 — up ~4.1% over the past day per CoinGecko — pushing the asset into weekly gains but still about 44% below last year’s $126,000 peak. - On Myriad, a prediction market, traders assigned a 13% probability that Strategy sells Bitcoin this year, down from 17% a month earlier. Leadership signal Co-founder and Executive Chairman Michael Saylor signaled the renewed buying push in a short tweet over the weekend: “Back to Work.” Bottom line: Strategy restarted active accumulation funded predominantly by STRC issuance, even as recent market moves left its BTC holdings with sizable unrealized losses. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Drift Drained for $285M in Months‑Long Governance Attack — DPRK Links Flagged
Morning Minute — Tyler Warner (opinions his own). Also: check our new daily news show covering top stories in 5 minutes or less on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Top story — Drift Protocol drained for $285M - Solana’s largest decentralized perpetuals exchange, Drift, was exploited for roughly $285 million on April 1. Investigations now point to a months‑long governance attack that culminated in a blistering 12 minutes of automated draining across 31 rapid withdrawals. - According to reporting, the operation began in October 2025 when attackers, posing as a quantitative trading firm, cultivated real-world relationships with protocol contributors at a major crypto conference and through multiple industry events over six months. That social engineering bought them trust and direct access to protocol insiders. - Attackers used that access to trick multisig signers into pre‑approving hidden transactions by exploiting Solana’s “durable nonce” feature, which lets authorizations sit dormant for weeks. They also created a fake token (CarbonVote/CVT), seeded it with a few thousand dollars and wash‑traded it into appearing liquid. That token was then used to manipulate Drift’s price oracles into accepting it as collateral worth hundreds of millions. - Blockchain forensics firms Elliptic and TRM Labs have flagged DPRK involvement; if confirmed, this would mark the 18th alleged North Korean crypto attack of 2026 and push total stolen this year above $300 million. Other headlines you need to know Charles Schwab to offer direct spot BTC & ETH - Charles Schwab told Decrypt it will launch spot Bitcoin and Ether trading this quarter. The brokerage, which manages $12.2 trillion in client assets, will let clients buy spot BTC and ETH inside the existing Schwab interface — no separate wallet, exchange account, or new app required. - This is not an ETF: Schwab clients will own spot BTC directly, custodyed via Charles Schwab Premier Bank. The rollout will be phased (employees first, then invited clients, then public). The plan: by the end of June every Schwab account holder could have direct access to BTC and ETH alongside their S&P 500 funds. Google paper tightens the quantum timeline for crypto - Google published research showing quantum computers may need roughly 20x fewer qubits than previously thought to break elliptic curve cryptography — the cryptographic foundation of Bitcoin and Ethereum. The necessary hardware still doesn’t exist, but the lower resource floor makes the timeline more urgent. - Google consulted the U.S. government, and used zero‑knowledge proofs so outside parties can verify resource estimates without revealing the attack circuits. Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, a late co‑author, estimated at least a 10% chance that by 2032 a quantum computer could recover a Bitcoin private key from an exposed public key. Coinbase wins conditional OCC trust charter — banks push back - The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency granted Coinbase conditional approval for a national trust bank charter. This isn’t Coinbase becoming a traditional bank; it does, however, give the exchange federal regulatory uniformity for custody services across all 50 states, replacing the patchwork of state licenses that has hampered institutional business and product launches. - Banking trade groups are fighting the move: both the ICBA and the Bank Policy Institute filed opposition letters. BPI argues the OCC approval would “exceed the OCC’s authority under federal law.” The ruling signals real momentum in the crypto‑to‑bank pipeline — and clear friction with legacy banking. Circle launches cirBTC to bring Bitcoin into DeFi - Circle announced cirBTC, a wrapped Bitcoin token backed 1:1 by native on‑chain Bitcoin reserves. It will launch first on Ethereum mainnet and on Arc, Circle’s stablecoin‑focused blockchain. - Circle VP Rachel Mayer framed the pitch: Bitcoin has been “sitting on the sidelines of DeFi” not because demand is lacking but because users don’t trust existing wrappers. WBTC — the dominant wrapped Bitcoin — has faced scrutiny over custody arrangements and hovers around ~$8 billion market cap. Coinbase’s cbBTC, launched last year and a reason Coinbase delisted WBTC, now sits near ~$6 billion. Circle is betting its USDC‑grade infrastructure will win trust in the wrapped‑BTC market. Also in today’s roundup - Corporate treasuries & ETFs updates - Meme coin tracker If you want deeper analysis on any of these stories, tell me which one and I’ll expand. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
ProPublica: US Repeats Cloud-Era Vendor Lock-In in AI — A Wake-Up Call for Crypto
New investigation: US repeating cloud-era mistakes as it rushes into AI A ProPublica investigation published April 6 by Renee Dudley warns that the federal government is moving into artificial intelligence the same way it did into cloud computing a decade ago—fast, cheap, and with the same weak oversight and vendor dependencies that left agencies exposed. The White House has framed AI as a national competitiveness priority and opened government access to commercial models at cut-rate prices: OpenAI’s ChatGPT for about $1 per user, Google’s Gemini for $0.47, and xAI’s Grok for $0.42. Dudley argues this mirrors the early 2010s push for cloud adoption under the Obama administration, when rapid procurement and attractive “free” offers led to long-term lock-in and security trade-offs. Three lessons from the cloud transition - “Free” upgrades can be lock-in mechanisms. Microsoft’s 2021 pledge of $150 million in security services to the federal government turned into a practical dependency: agencies who accepted the upgrades faced high switching costs later. Even Microsoft and OpenAI have since disputed terms of their own AI partnership—an indicator of how fraught big-tech AI contracts can be. - Oversight needs funding and muscle. FedRAMP (the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program), created in 2011 to vet cloud services, was pressured to approve major products despite cybersecurity concerns. ProPublica reports the program now operates “with an absolute minimum of support staff” and “limited customer service,” while a GSA spokesperson defended it as operating “with strengthened oversight and accountability mechanisms.” Former staffers say it has at times functioned like a rubber stamp. - Independent audits aren’t truly independent if vendors pay them. As FedRAMP’s in-house capacity shrank, third-party auditing firms hired and paid by cloud providers picked up vetting duties. Understaffed agencies then relied on those vendor-funded ratings rather than conducting deep, independent reviews. The immediate risks for AI adoption The General Services Administration (GSA) has warned that AI “usage costs can grow quickly without proper monitoring and management controls,” and has urged agencies to set usage limits and monitor consumption. But Dudley’s reporting highlights deeper structural problems: underfunded oversight bodies, a vetting ecosystem financed by the very vendors being reviewed, and agencies that lose leverage once a technology is embedded. Dudley’s closing warning is blunt: “The implications of this downsizing for federal cybersecurity are far-reaching.” For crypto and AI advocates watching government adoption closely, the takeaway is clear—cheap, rapid access to powerful models can produce long-term security, fiscal, and governance liabilities unless procurement rules, funding for independent oversight, and anti–vendor-lock-in safeguards are strengthened. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Google Spotlight Sparks 50% ALGO Rally as Algorand Touted for Post‑Quantum Security
Algorand’s ALGO has ripped higher this month, gaining roughly 50% — from about $0.079 to $0.126 — after Google’s Quantum AI team spotlighted the blockchain as a real-world model for post‑quantum security. The token rallied to an 11‑week high of $0.126 on April 6, pushing Algorand’s market cap close to $1.1 billion and lifting ALGO more than 7% that day amid a broader market uptick tied to ceasefire headlines. The immediate catalyst was a landmark Google‑authored paper published April 1, “Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities,” co‑written with researchers from UC Berkeley, Stanford and the Ethereum Foundation. The study warned that future quantum computers could break the elliptic curve cryptography underpinning most blockchains — and it cited Algorand 32 times as a working example of how a network can harden itself today. Google highlighted three concrete features that set Algorand apart: - FALCON digital signatures — a lattice‑based scheme that NIST has selected for post‑quantum standardization. - State Proofs — periodic, post‑quantum‑secure certificates the protocol emits every 256 rounds to attest to ledger integrity. - Native rekeying — a user‑level ability to rotate private keys without changing public addresses, simplifying key migration to post‑quantum algorithms. Algorand also executed what it calls its first post‑quantum secured transaction in 2025 — a milestone most larger networks haven’t yet reached. The quantum narrative arrived alongside important regulatory and commercial developments. In March and early April 2026, the SEC and CFTC jointly classified ALGO as a digital commodity — a development Algorand Foundation CEO Staci Warden called “bedrock regulatory clarity,” arguing the move lowers compliance barriers for institutional capital. Retail and institutional access widened in tandem: Revolut (70M+ users) launched ALGO staking, trimming circulating supply and broadening retail participation, while Swiss bank PostFinance enabled ALGO trading and custody for European clients. Algorand’s ecosystem also hosts an estimated $425 million in tokenized real‑world assets on‑chain. Market interest intensified: ALGO derivatives open interest jumped from about $38 million at the end of March to roughly $81 million by April 4, more than doubling in under a week. Across the industry, post‑quantum readiness is evolving from a theoretical goal into a commercial baseline, and Algorand is benefiting from that shift. That said, ALGO remains far below its all‑time highs and short‑term technicals point to overbought conditions. The durability of the rally will likely hinge on whether the quantum‑security story keeps gaining traction — and whether it can withstand near‑term macroeconomic and market forces. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
ETHGlobal Cannes Finalists Signal Ethereum's Next Wave: AI Agents, Privacy & On‑Chain Markets
ETHGlobal’s Cannes hackathon just unveiled a technically ambitious top 10 that signals where Ethereum devs are betting: AI agents, privacy infrastructure and on‑chain prediction markets. In a brief “Drumroll please…” tweet, ETHGlobal announced the finalists: “Our ETHGlobal Cannes finalists are here! We’re excited to announce the top 10 projects of the weekend: ENShell, DIVE, maki, Défi, ALMA, npmguard, VEIL VPN, PaintGlobal, EVM PORST, Corpus.” The winners are showcased on ETHGlobal’s portal and reflect an event focused on teaching new skills, strengthening developer communities, and pushing new tech boundaries. Standout projects and what they aim to solve - ENShell (CodeQuillClaim): A protective layer for AI agents that prevents malicious transactions triggered by prompt injection. ENShell wraps agent transaction flows in an ENS‑aware “shell” that checks proposed actions against machine‑readable policies before a signature leaves the wallet — effectively putting access control and policy enforcement between LLM prompts and on‑chain execution. - DIVE: An “AI swarm engine” intended to verify real‑world truth for prediction markets and automated settlement. The idea is a multi‑agent oracle layer that cross‑checks external data and resolves disagreements before writing outcomes to settlement contracts, moving prediction markets away from fragile single‑oracle designs. - VEIL VPN: Short for Verifiable Encrypted Internet Layer, VEIL is billed as a pay‑as‑you‑go VPN protocol that cryptographically proves “no logs” are kept. Its approach aims to combine encrypted tunnels, on‑chain settlement and server‑side attestations so privacy claims can be audited rather than treated as marketing. - Corpus: Positions products themselves as autonomous agent “corps” that run go‑to‑market, trading and treasury tasks. Corpus suggests a composable, multi‑bot architecture where separate agents manage growth, liquidity and ops using shared protocol wallets and on‑chain reputations—anticipating a future with significant activity initiated by semi‑autonomous services rather than direct human clicks. Why ENS matters here ETHGlobal’s ENS prize track explicitly frames the Ethereum Name Service as an “identity layer for the new internet” — the mechanism for naming, reputations and discoverability as AI agents become first‑class on‑chain actors. ENShell reads as a reference implementation in that context, using ENS identities to attach policies and revoke or quarantine suspicious agent behaviors. The ENS prize track includes a “Best ENS Integration for AI Agents” pool ($4,000 total: $2,500 first, $1,500 second) plus a “Most Creative Use of ENS” award with $6,000 available — underscoring a prize focus on agent‑centric integrations. Broader implications - Oracles and settlements: DIVE’s multi‑agent verification hints at a shift to resilient, decentralized oracle swarms—closer to how traditional finance runs redundant feeds—improving robustness for prediction markets and automated payouts. - Privacy and networking: VEIL VPN takes the trust problem at the network layer seriously, proposing cryptographic proofs and on‑chain incentives to make “no logs” verifiable and enforceable. - Agent‑native products: Corpus and ENShell reflect a larger trend toward building on‑chain services that expect agents to have names, reputations and enforced guardrails—ecosystem primitives that let autonomous services negotiate, trade and manage funds. Hackathons as capital‑efficient R&D ETHGlobal frames events like Cannes as more than contests: they’re concentrated R&D funnels where teams can capture $5,000–$10,000 top prizes and tap partner bounties. The platform lets teams select up to three partner prizes per submission and awards across themes from tooling hooks to Filecoin‑backed data and AI categories. Aggregate prize pools commonly reach $20,000 or more, providing non‑dilutive funding and distribution for teams that ship workable prototypes over a weekend. Bottom line The Cannes finalist slate is a clear bet on agent‑first architecture, verifiable privacy, and robust on‑chain truth sources. ENShell, DIVE, VEIL VPN and Corpus aren’t just demo‑day builds — they point to the kinds of primitives Ethereum may need as autonomous agents, provable networking and multi‑agent oracles move from experiment to infrastructure. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news