Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.19T
Market Cap
$2.19T
24h Trading Volume
$138.16B
BTC Dominance
55.80%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Cardano Plunges 30%, Falls Below $0.20 as TapTools Shuts Down; Hoskinson Warns
Cardano (ADA) plunged sharply this week, posting a roughly 30% monthly decline and slipping below the key $0.20 support level on Thursday — the first time it has traded under that mark in more than five years. The rout comes amid a broader market downturn and growing internal alarm within the Cardano community. The flashpoint was TapTools, a widely used Cardano analytics and data service that announced it will wind down operations within two weeks. TapTools supports more than one million users and has provided backend data for hundreds of Cardano-native token projects over the past four years. Its sudden exit is being read by many as an early sign of stress not just for a single product, but for the ecosystem’s infrastructure and developer economy. Cardano co-founder Charles Hoskinson amplified those concerns. In a video posted earlier Thursday, he warned the second half of the year could bring a wave of project failures, forced consolidations and decentralized finance (DeFi) shutdowns across the Cardano ecosystem. Hoskinson framed TapTools’ closure as a “leading indicator” of deeper problems, and later told followers on X (formerly Twitter) that he is “taking a break.” Market watchers see the combination of ecosystem turmoil and public warnings from a co-founder as a heavy bearish signal. Analyst Ali Martinez said on social media that, on the weekly chart, ADA’s next downside targets could be $0.11 and then $0.051 — levels that would imply an additional fall of roughly 71% from current trading near $0.18 at the time of writing. Martinez added, “I’d be taking a break too if I were him.” What this means for Cardano remains uncertain. TapTools’ shutdown highlights vulnerabilities in the infrastructure that supports token projects and DeFi activity on the chain, and Hoskinson’s comments have put a spotlight on potential consolidation in the months ahead. Traders and holders will be watching whether other service providers or projects follow TapTools’ lead, and whether the broader crypto market rally or further declines will determine ADA’s next direction. (Featured image created with OpenArt; price chart via TradingView.com.) Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Saylor Maps 4 Competing Visions for Bitcoin, Urges "Disciplined Expansion" Amid Market Shift
Michael Saylor has framed Bitcoin’s next chapter by mapping out four competing visions for how the asset should evolve — a timely intervention as the network grows beyond its early role and as markets test its place in global finance. In a new paper, Saylor argues Bitcoin has graduated from “a narrow technical experiment or a niche monetary protest” to a global monetary network that now matters to individuals, corporations, banks, capital markets and governments. That maturity, he says, naturally produces distinct schools of thought about adoption, upgrades, market access and how to protect Bitcoin’s core principles. Saylor divides the debate into four camps: - Bitcoin Maximalists: See Bitcoin as the dominant digital monetary network — sound money and a store of value for people facing inflation, currency debasement or weak systems. Maximalists provide moral clarity on Bitcoin’s purpose, but Saylor notes they still must explain how the network fits with banks, companies, capital markets and governments. - Bitcoin Capitalists: Take a market-first approach. They want Bitcoin inside portfolios, corporate balance sheets, credit products, securities, custody systems and other global financial infrastructure. This group treats Bitcoin as “digital capital” and favors tools that bring institutional access and scale. - Bitcoin Technologists: Focus on technical improvements — scalability, privacy, security, usability, wallet and custody design, and threats like quantum computing. Saylor cautions that protocol changes carry risk: the base layer’s value depends on stability, so upgrades must meet a high bar. - Bitcoin Fundamentalists: Emphasize self-custody, personal nodes, decentralization, immutability and censorship-resistance. They worry that banks, custodians, leverage and financial engineering could dilute Bitcoin’s original purpose, and see their role as defending its core principles while avoiding an exclusionary stance on adoption. The paper lands amid a delicate moment for Saylor and his company, MicroStrategy. This week MicroStrategy sold 32 BTC for roughly $2.5 million — its first sale since 2022 — a small amount relative to its overall holdings but one that drew scrutiny given Saylor’s long-standing advocacy for holding Bitcoin. The move coincided with Bitcoin trading near $60,000 and signs of ETF outflows and weakening sentiment, underscoring how market dynamics now intersect with strategic and philosophical choices. Saylor’s conclusion favors a blended approach. He argues for “disciplined expansion”: protect and preserve the stability of Bitcoin’s base layer while permitting markets, custody tools, applications and financial products to develop around it. In short, he frames the groups not as enemies but as complementary forces that must negotiate a path between preservation and practical adoption as Bitcoin continues to mature. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
ZachXBT: 'Avoid Rain Protocol' — Claims $8.8B Token Is Overhyped and Possibly Manipulated
On-chain investigator ZachXBT has issued a stark warning to traders: steer clear of Rain Protocol, a project he says is overhyped and potentially manipulated despite a reported $8.8 billion valuation that places RAIN among the top-15 crypto assets by market value. What ZachXBT is saying - Weak fundamentals: In a detailed on-chain review, ZachXBT argues Rain shows minimal user traction, limited product adoption, no marquee backers, and a team with little public crypto history. He told traders to avoid the project “at all costs,” stressing a large disconnect between the token’s reported valuation and visible activity. - Questionable wallet links: The investigator flagged wallet connections between addresses tied to the RAIN deployer and failed projects such as Data Ownership Protocol (DOP) and TOMI. He traced funding flows involving the Gems hot wallet and several centralized exchange (CEX) deposit addresses. - Dust-transfer trail: ZachXBT highlighted two small (“dust”) transfers to the same address on Oct. 14, 2025 — one originating from a wallet he associates with the RAIN deployer, another from a wallet he links to the TOMI team multisig and a CEX deposit address. He says the recipient later received funds from an address funded by a DOP multisig, and that separate trails used the same exchange deposit addresses, suggesting overlapping ties between these entities. Allegations of on-chain price manipulation ZachXBT also alleges on-chain price manipulation: he claims addresses connected to the deployer were using Uniswap V3 liquidity pools while routing spot transfers through the Gems hot wallet. These paths, he says, may have been used to create an artificial trading picture for RAIN. These findings remain allegations until verified by the project, exchanges, or regulators. Rain Protocol had not issued a public response in the materials reviewed. Liquidity and usage data Citing DefiLlama, ZachXBT notes Rain Protocol holds about $27.2 million locked on Arbitrum — but he says most of that is the project’s own illiquid token. He also estimates the protocol generates roughly $1 million a year in fees, a figure he implies is inconsistent with an $8.8 billion market valuation and with established prediction-market platforms like Kalshi or Polymarket. Questions around Enlivex ZachXBT raised doubts about Enlivex, the Nasdaq-listed company tied to RAIN’s digital-asset treasury plan. Enlivex announced a $212 million treasury strategy in November 2025; ZachXBT argues Rain’s structure and activity do not compare favorably to established prediction-market operators. Kraken downgrade and bounty As part of the same thread, ZachXBT downgraded Kraken from S-tier to B-tier, accusing the exchange of insufficient due diligence when listing tokens he describes as low-quality or potentially manipulated (including M, RAIN, RIVER, and RAVE). He also criticized Kraken’s public handling of a recent security breach, saying it did not clearly address compensation for affected users as some rivals have done. Separately, ZachXBT said he has raised his bounty to as much as $100,000 for insiders who can provide documents or chat logs related to alleged CEX market-manipulation schemes. Context and next steps Rain Protocol had already drawn scrutiny over its rapid rise to a multibillion-dollar valuation and questions about its tokenomics and liquidity setup. The latest alert adds to an ongoing debate around token listings, thin liquidity, market-maker activity, and retail risk. Traders and observers are now waiting to see whether Rain, Kraken, Enlivex, or exchanges will respond with verifiable on-chain or operational details to confirm or refute the claims. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Crypto Meets Carbon: 7RCC’s BTCK ETF Launches on NYSE Arca with 80/20 Bitcoin-Carbon Mix
7RCC’s BTCK ETF brings Bitcoin and regulated carbon credits to NYSE Arca 7RCC Global has launched BTCK, an exchange-traded fund that blends spot Bitcoin exposure with regulated carbon credit futures, marking one of the crypto sector’s earliest ESG-focused ETF concepts to reach the public market. The product began trading on NYSE Arca under the ticker BTCK and tracks the 7RCC Kaiko Bitcoin Carbon Credit Index, aiming to mirror daily value changes in both asset classes, net of expenses. What’s in the fund - Allocation: roughly 80% Bitcoin, 20% carbon credit futures. - Carbon exposure: futures tied to major regulated markets, including the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), California Cap-and-Trade, and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). - Structure: listed ETF that provides these combined exposures without requiring investors to hold crypto wallets or open accounts on digital-asset exchanges. Why it matters BTCK departs from standard spot Bitcoin ETFs by combining cryptocurrency exposure with regulated environmental commodities. Bitcoin’s performance is driven by adoption and macro/monetary forces, while the carbon futures leg is shaped by emissions policy and compliance demand—giving investors a single product that mixes two distinct market drivers. 7RCC says the vehicle offers transparent access to exposures that can be difficult to replicate within a single investment structure. Company comment and origins “ We started 7RCC because we believed digital assets would become a permanent part of the global financial system and that investors would want them in familiar, regulated structures built for the long term,” said Rali Perduhova, co-founder and CEO of 7RCC Global. Perduhova emphasized that BTCK combines “two asset classes driven by distinct market forces.” Regulatory and market context 7RCC initially filed with the U.S. SEC for an ESG-oriented Bitcoin ETF using this 80/20 model about two and a half years ago—an early attempt to fuse spot Bitcoin with environmental market investments that drew attention from ETF analysts. The launch comes amid intensifying competition among ETF issuers—firms like Grayscale, 21Shares and Bitwise have been expanding their product sets and experimenting with differentiated strategies beyond plain-vanilla spot crypto exposure. Carbon markets are also drawing institutional interest. In July 2025 Bloomberg reported that JPMorgan’s Kinexys unit worked with S&P Global Commodity Insights, EcoRegistry and the International Carbon Registry to explore tokenizing carbon credits on blockchain infrastructure to improve transparency and record-keeping. BTCK, however, keeps its carbon allocation in regulated futures contracts rather than tokenized credits. Operational details and counterparties - BTCK is a series of Teucrium Commodity Trust, sponsored by Teucrium Trading LLC, with PINE Distributors LLC as marketing agent. - Gemini Trust Company holds the fund’s Bitcoin. - U.S. Bank serves as cash custodian and administrator. - The index is administered by Kaiko and calculated by Solactive AG. Implications for investors BTCK could appeal to investors seeking regulated, ETF-style access to Bitcoin while also expressing exposure to carbon-market dynamics—without the custody and operational overhead of directly holding digital assets. As crypto-linked ETF strategies proliferate, BTCK represents a niche ESG-flavored approach that may attract those looking to pair crypto upside with environmental-commodity exposure. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitget Lets Tokenized Stocks & ETFs Power USDT-M Futures Margin
Bitget has made it easier to use tokenized stocks and ETFs as margin for futures trading, expanding the ways traders can leverage tokenized real-world assets on its platform. What changed - Effective June 4, Bitget enabled 15 tokenized equities and ETFs to be used as collateral for USDT-margined (USDT-M) futures within its Unified Trading Account and Multi-Asset Mode. - The newly eligible rTokens are: rAAPL, rAMZN, rMETA, rMU, rTSLA, rGOOGL, rNVDA, rINTC, rMSFT, rASML, rAVGO, rTSM, rQQQ, rSPY, and rSNDK. Why it matters - Under Bitget’s Unified Trading Account, users can manage spot balances, derivatives positions, and margin obligations in a single account. Allowing tokenized stocks and ETFs to count toward margin in Multi-Asset Mode means traders don’t have to convert holdings into a single settlement currency before opening or maintaining futures positions. That increases capital efficiency and flexibility for users who hold tokenized equities. Bitget’s view - Bitget CEO Gracy Chen, whose comments were added to the update, said growing adoption of tokenized financial products is driving demand for more ways to deploy those assets across trading activities. “Adding tokenized stocks and ETFs as margin assets increases flexibility within the Unified Trading Account and supports a more seamless experience across crypto and traditional market products,” she said. How this fits into Bitget’s tokenization push - The move follows Bitget’s recent expansion into tokenized products. In May the exchange launched Reality, a regulated tokenization platform that issues rTokens—blockchain tokens backed 1:1 by U.S. stocks and ETFs held via regulated broker-dealers. Bitget says Reality was designed to tackle common tokenization issues such as liquidity and management of dividends and corporate actions, and that rTokens are supported by infrastructure connected to major U.S. exchanges and backed by reserve attestations from accounting firm The Network Firm. - Several of the assets just approved as futures collateral come from the Reality suite. Bitget is shifting them from pure spot exposure into its derivatives ecosystem, letting traders deploy tokenized equities in more sophisticated strategies. Other recent moves - In May Bitget also launched SPCXUSDT, a SpaceX-linked pre-IPO perpetual contract for speculating on a potential public listing, and rolled out various IPO-linked and tokenized-equity products tied to both public and private markets. - Bitget Wallet integrated xStocks infrastructure in May as well, bringing access to over 130 tokenized stocks and ETFs through a self-custodial wallet and expanding its tokenized RWA offering to more than 300 products (equities, commodities, precious metals, and index-linked assets). Scale and reach - Bitget reports its tokenized equity products have processed more than $30 billion in trading volume since 2025 and that its trading ecosystem provides access to more than 100 tokenized stocks, ETFs, commodities, FX products, and precious metals. Bottom line - By allowing tokenized Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and other major equities and ETFs to serve as futures collateral, Bitget is blurring lines between on-chain tokenized exposure and traditional derivatives trading—offering traders more ways to mobilize tokenized holdings without converting them into fiat or a single settlement asset. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
South Korea Targets Polymarket Users in First Criminal Probe Over Gambling Law
South Korean police open first probe into Polymarket users amid gambling law concerns South Korean authorities have launched what is believed to be the country's first criminal probe targeting domestic users of Polymarket, the Ethereum-based prediction market, as investigators examine whether trading on the platform violates local gambling statutes. According to reporting from Chosun Biz, the Gangwon Provincial Police Agency — acting on a request from the national police headquarters — is investigating South Korean residents who used Polymarket. The inquiry spans users across the country, including those in Gangwon Province, and centers on whether participation in prediction markets constitutes illegal gambling under Article 246 of the Criminal Act. That statute carries penalties including fines up to ₩10 million (roughly $6,500). What’s being examined - Polymarket enables users to buy and sell positions tied to real-world outcomes — elections, sports, economic releases and geopolitical events — with settlement handled by Ethereum smart contracts rather than a central operator. - South Korea tightly restricts betting; aside from government-authorized Sports Toto products (which carry a ₩100,000, about $65, betting limit), most wagering outside state-sanctioned channels is broadly considered illegal. - Authorities are therefore probing whether trades on Polymarket meet the legal criteria for “gambling” or habitual gambling offenses. Scope and scale Chosun Biz reports that markets tied to South Korea’s June 3 local elections drew substantial activity — “hundreds of billions of won” in betting volume — equivalent to tens of millions of dollars. Investigators say many domestic users accessed Polymarket directly and placed trades using dollar-backed stablecoins. The decentralized nature of Polymarket’s infrastructure means enforcement is likely to target individual users rather than the platform itself. Legal uncertainty and defense Attorney Ahn Chang-bo, representing some of the users under investigation, told Chosun Biz that the factual elements required for a gambling offense appear present, but noted there is no domestic precedent for prosecuting Polymarket use, making outcomes uncertain. Broader enforcement trend The probe follows a broader pattern of South Korean authorities applying existing laws to decentralized crypto activity. In May, prosecutors charged parties over the CATFI meme-coin rug pull — described as the country’s first arrest and prosecution tied to a decentralized exchange under the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. Prosecutors said the case underscored that enforcement is no longer limited to centralized exchanges or locally listed tokens. Global scrutiny of prediction markets Polymarket has also drawn regulatory attention abroad. In the U.S., prosecutors charged a Google software engineer, Michele Spagnuolo, with insider trading for allegedly using confidential company information to trade Polymarket contracts tied to Google search rankings; the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a related civil complaint asserting that insider-trading rules apply to prediction markets. The platform has faced other legal challenges and regulatory scrutiny across several U.S. states as policymakers debate whether prediction markets should be treated as derivatives or as gambling. Why it matters The South Korean probe is a test case for how regulators will handle user activity on decentralized platforms. If authorities pursue criminal penalties against individual traders, it could signal a tightened enforcement posture toward crypto-native prediction markets and reinforce the legal risks for users who participate in off-exchange, blockchain-based betting markets. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news