Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.41T
Market Cap
$2.41T
24h Trading Volume
$94.75B
BTC Dominance
56.56%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Schwab Warns: Even 1% Crypto Can Supercharge Portfolio Volatility
Charles Schwab’s new research makes a clear, practical point: cryptocurrencies aren’t just another asset class — they’re volatility machines, and even a tiny slice can reshape a diversified portfolio. The report spotlights bitcoin (BTC, $68,133.59) and ether (ETH) as examples of high-volatility assets that have historically produced sharp swings. Both have experienced drawdowns exceeding 70% in past cycles, far deeper than typical stock or bond declines. “Any allocation to cryptocurrency is likely to increase a portfolio's volatility,” Schwab writes, underscoring how quickly crypto exposure can change risk dynamics. That volatility means small allocations can punch above their weight. Schwab finds that a low single-digit position — sometimes as little as 1% to 3% of a portfolio — can meaningfully affect total portfolio risk and how portfolios behave during market stress. In other words, crypto’s footprint on risk can be much larger than its footprint on capital. Schwab outlines two common ways investors add crypto exposure: - Traditional portfolio theory (mean-variance): allocations are set based on expected returns, volatility, and correlations. Schwab warns this method hinges on return assumptions, which vary widely among investors. The paper argues that if expected returns on crypto are under about 10%, the risk-adjusted case for a significant allocation weakens, even for aggressive investors — so small changes in return forecasts can produce big swings in recommended allocation. - Risk budgeting: instead of guessing returns, investors decide how much of the portfolio’s total risk they’re willing to attribute to crypto. This shifts the focus from chasing performance to setting tolerance. Schwab cautions, however, that crypto’s realized volatility can exceed expectations, complicating strict risk budgets. The firm emphasizes there is no universal “correct” allocation. Personal factors — investment horizon, familiarity with digital assets, and capacity for loss — should drive the decision. Schwab also reiterates familiar warnings: cryptocurrencies and crypto-related products remain speculative and aren’t suitable for everyone, carrying risks such as illiquidity, theft, and fraud. Bottom line: crypto can offer diversification and upside, but it behaves like a high-risk satellite holding rather than a core portfolio component. Even a one-percent position deserves careful thought — because in the world of crypto, a small bet can change everything. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Crypto ETP Inflows Rebound $224M, But Switzerland and XRP Mask Weak U.S. Demand
Global crypto ETP inflows rebounded to $224 million last week, but the recovery looks far narrower when you dig into the details. Key takeaways - Total inflows: $224 million (after a $414 million outflow the prior week), per CoinShares. - Geographic concentration: Switzerland accounted for roughly $157 million — about 70% of the total. Germany and the U.S. each added roughly $28 million, Canada $11 million. - Asset concentration: XRP drove the move, drawing roughly $120 million — more than half of global inflows and its largest weekly intake since mid-December 2025. Most of that demand came from European and other international ETPs, not U.S. spot XRP ETFs. - U.S. XRP funds: SoSoValue data show five U.S.-listed spot XRP ETFs (Canary, Bitwise, Franklin, 21Shares, Grayscale) recorded near-zero flows over the past two weeks and hold about $940 million in combined net assets. - Bitcoin: Bitcoin ETPs attracted $107 million, but only $22 million came via U.S. spot ETFs, which remain negative year-to-date. Separately, “Strategy” disclosed buying 4,871 BTC (~$330 million) that same week — roughly 15 times what the entire U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF complex added. - Institutional buying channels: CoinDesk reports ETFs absorbed about 50,000 BTC in March’s rolling 30-day window, the highest since October 2025. Still, most sustained institutional demand is flowing through spot ETFs and the single disclosed buyer, and ETF momentum is weakening weekly. The broader ETP market — including leveraged, short and altcoin funds — doesn’t confirm a broad “institutions are buying” narrative. - Ether: ETH products continued to bleed, posting $53 million in outflows after $222 million the prior week, taking year-to-date outflows to $327 million. In contrast, Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) bought 71,252 ETH last week — its largest single-week purchase since December 2025 — and now holds about 4.8 million ETH (roughly $10 billion). - Drivers and implications: CoinShares’ James Butterfill links ether weakness partly to uncertainty around the CLARITY Act, stablecoin legislation tied to Ethereum’s ecosystem. Geographic concentration matters for reading conviction: the Coinbase Premium Index — a gauge of U.S. institutional flow — has been persistently negative since bitcoin’s all-time high above $126,000 in October 2025. The data suggest marginal buyers right now are largely European, not American. Bottom line: The headline $224 million inflow masks heavy concentration by country (Switzerland) and asset (XRP), while U.S. institutional participation remains muted. That makes this rebound less broad-based than it first appears. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
CoinDesk 20 slides 2.4% as all 20 components fall; AAVE -8.5%, AVAX -7.6%
Headline: CoinDesk 20 slides 2.4% as every constituent posts losses Summary: The CoinDesk 20 Index fell 2.4% on the day, closing at 1,917.55 (down 47.87 points), with all 20 constituents trading lower in a broad-based pullback. Details: - Index level: 1,917.55, down 2.4% (-47.87) since yesterday’s close. - Market breadth: 20/20 assets declined. - Smallest declines: Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Crypto.com Coin (CRO), each off about 1.0%. - Biggest losers: Aave (AAVE) fell roughly 8.5% and Avalanche (AVAX) dropped about 7.6%. Context: The move represents a widespread risk-off session across the CoinDesk 20 basket. The index is a broad-based benchmark and is traded on multiple platforms across several regions globally. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Solana Launches Stride Audits and SIRN After $270M Drift Exploit
Five days after a $270 million exploit rocked the Solana ecosystem, the Solana Foundation unveiled a multi-part security overhaul aimed at shoring up DeFi defenses — and at improving how the network responds when things go wrong. What was announced - Stride: a structured evaluation program led by Asymmetric Research that will assess Solana DeFi protocols against eight security pillars and publish the results publicly. Protocols with more than $10 million in TVL that pass Stride will receive ongoing operational security and active threat monitoring paid for by Solana Foundation grants, with protections scaled to each project’s risk profile. Protocols above $100 million in TVL are eligible for foundation-funded formal verification — a mathematical check that proves smart contract execution paths are correct. - Solana Incident Response Network (SIRN): a membership-based consortium of security firms and researchers intended to coordinate real-time crisis response, building ties with exchanges, bridges, stablecoin issuers and other custodial actors. Who’s involved Founding participants include Asymmetric Research, OtterSec, Neodyme, Squads and ZeroShadow. The programs are open to all Solana protocols but will be prioritized by TVL. Why this matters — and what it won’t solve The announcements follow the Drift Protocol hack, in which a North Korean state-affiliated group stole roughly $270 million after a six-month social-engineering campaign. Crucially, Drift’s smart contracts were not directly exploited — they had passed audits. The attackers instead compromised contributor devices via a malicious code repository and a fake TestFlight app, used those devices to get multisig approvals, lock them into durable-nonce transactions, and execute them weeks later. That attack exposed a core gap: on-chain correctness does not equal off-chain trust. Formal verification and continuous on-chain monitoring are powerful, but neither would have prevented this breach. Formal verification can prove a contract’s logic, and 24/7 on-chain monitoring can flag suspicious transactions — yet the Drift transactions were valid by design and indistinguishable from legitimate administrative actions until they were executed to drain funds. Where SIRN could help While Stride’s checks wouldn’t have detected the human-targeted social engineering, an incident response network like SIRN could shorten reaction times after an exploit. Security observers pointed to a critical six-hour window after the Drift attack when Circle did not freeze more than $230 million in USDC that had been moved. A pre-established response network with direct lines to bridge operators, exchanges and stablecoin issuers might have constrained funds faster — though it’s unclear whether that would have stopped the attacker from using bridges like Wormhole and obfuscation tools such as Tornado Cash. Foundation’s stance and existing tools The Solana Foundation emphasized these programs “do not transfer the underlying responsibility away from the protocols themselves,” a pointed reminder after the Drift postmortem highlighted contributor-device compromise as the attack vector. Solana already offers several free security tools for builders, including Hypernative for threat detection, Range Security for real-time monitoring, and Neodyme’s Riverguard for attack simulation. Bottom line Stride and SIRN represent a meaningful step toward coordinated, proactive and reactive security on Solana — especially for high-value protocols — but they also underscore a hard lesson from Drift: technical correctness on-chain is necessary but not sufficient. Off-chain human and operational security remains the frontier where nation-state actors can still cause the greatest damage. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin Decouples From Software Stocks as Iran Conflict, AI Fears Reshape Markets
Headline: Bitcoin breaks from software stocks as Iran conflict and AI fears reshape market links Since the outbreak of the Iran conflict on Feb. 28, bitcoin has begun to diverge from software equities, with the iShares Expanded Tech‑Software Sector ETF (IGV) — a common proxy for software names — showing an increasingly different trajectory. What’s happening - Bitcoin has been one of the stronger performers in this stretch, rising more than 5% since late February and trading back above $69,000 at times (roughly $68k–69k currently), including a gain of more than 0.5% over the past 24 hours. - By contrast, IGV has fallen more than 2% over the same period. The gap suggests investors are starting to treat bitcoin and software stocks separately, at least in the near term. Past linkage and recent split - Until recently the two moved closely. Over the past three months bitcoin dropped about 26% while IGV fell roughly 23%; year‑to‑date both are down around 21%. Over five years bitcoin has gained about 18% versus roughly 10% for IGV — same direction but with much greater crypto volatility. - From their peaks, bitcoin plunged about 50% from its October all‑time high, while IGV fell about 35% from its own top. Correlation data - The correlation between bitcoin and IGV was almost perfect (near +1.0) in early February, meaning they moved nearly in lockstep. After the conflict began, that relationship weakened sharply: correlation dropped to about 0.13 — effectively a near‑decoupling — before rebounding to roughly 0.7. (Correlation ranges from -1.0 to +1.0, with 0 indicating no correlation.) Why the split matters - IGV is dominated by large software and services companies such as Microsoft, Oracle and Salesforce. Investors are increasingly worried that the rise of artificial intelligence could compress margins and valuation multiples across software — especially SaaS — as competition intensifies and barriers to entry fall. - Bitcoin, meanwhile, is behaving more like a macro asset, picking up demand amid geopolitical uncertainty and being treated as an alternative store of value by some market participants. Bottom line The recent divergence underscores how macro shocks (geopolitical risk) and structural tech trends (AI) can rewire correlations that had appeared stable. Traders and portfolio managers should expect these relationships to remain fluid: correlation has partially recovered but is not back to earlier levels, leaving room for further decoupling or reconvergence depending on how the conflict and AI narratives evolve. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Spot BTC ETFs Add $471M, Keep Bitcoin Near $68.8K as BTC Flips to Leading Macro Pricer
Bitcoin hovered near $68,780 on Tuesday as U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs posted their biggest daily inflow in more than a month. According to SoSoValue, funds added a combined $471 million on April 6 — the largest single-day intake since Feb. 25 and the sixth-largest daily total so far this year. That figure still trails January’s peak regime, when multiple days saw flows above $700 million. The flows are notable because bitcoin has been stuck below the $70,000 mark, with weak spot-market demand and distribution by large holders limiting upside. In that environment, ETF buying has become the primary source of marginal demand, absorbing available supply and helping to stabilize prices. Macro signals offer little directional thrust. Markets price a roughly 98% chance the Federal Reserve will keep rates unchanged at its April meeting, per Polymarket, leaving few expectations for near-term rate moves. But the bigger structural shift may be how bitcoin now reacts to global monetary policy. A Binance Research note highlights a sharp change since 2024 — the year U.S. spot ETFs were approved — in bitcoin’s relationship with its Global Easing Breadth Index (which tracks easing/tightening across 41 central banks). Where bitcoin once tended to follow easing cycles with a lag, that correlation has flipped and turned strongly negative, with the inverse effect nearly three times stronger. “BTC may have evolved from a macro 'lagging receiver' to a 'leading pricer,'” Binance Research wrote. The explanation is straightforward: retail investors historically reacted to macro after the fact, while ETF-driven institutional flows are more forward-looking, positioning ahead of expected policy moves. As ETFs continue to soak up supply and anchor prices, bitcoin could increasingly trade as a forward-looking asset that prices central bank pivots before broader markets do. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news